This record contains the Experiment 10 paper in the Volumetric Time Model research program. The paper presents E10 as a dedicated empirical geometry suite for operational agency under delay, instability, and constraint. Using the calibrated agency scale established by Experiment 9, the paper studies four mechanisms: temporal shadowing by lower-latency competitors, constraint diffraction through fixed architectural rules, entropy-resilient survival of readable structure, and refractive recovery through early logic-layer intervention. The main results are: a hollow-basin diffraction result in which the effective steering horizon collapses from about tau ≈ 34 to tau = 3, corresponding to a 91. 2% loss of steering volume a precision entropy survival profile with layered crossings at tauₐlpha ≈ 133. 1427, tauₙoise ≈ 156. 8165, and tauₐlpha² ≈ 256. 1488 a 486-run local portability sweep preserving the full ordering tauₐlpha < tauₙoise < tauₐlpha² in 100% of tested cases a refraction sweep showing that positive horizon recovery is placement-sensitive, with gains confined to very early placement and a best observed gain of 48. 50% The paper argues that operational agency is better modeled as a geometric field of shadowing, diffraction, resonance, and refraction than as a simple binary control channel. It is the empirical companion to the separate theory paper, The Operational Agency Horizon: A Unified Framework for Steering, Forecasting, and Readout Boundaries in the Volumetric Time Model.
Ralph Clayton (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: