Smart energy networks, including electricity distribution and district heating, are increasingly operated as sensor-enabled infrastructures where maintenance decisions must be made under heterogeneous and time-varying operating conditions. In these settings, time-to-event data are rarely complete; preventive actions and limited observation horizons routinely introduce censoring and truncation, so models and validation procedures must account for partially observed lifetimes to avoid biased inference and misleading performance estimates. This review surveys survival models for predictive maintenance (PdM) and remaining useful life (RUL) estimation, spanning non-parametric, semi-parametric, parametric, and learning-based approaches, with emphasis on censoring-aware formulations and the use of static and time-varying covariates derived from sensor, inspection, and contextual information. A structured taxonomy and a systematic mapping of model families to data types, core assumptions (proportional hazards versus parametric distributional structure), and decision-oriented outputs such as risk ranking, horizon failure probabilities, and RUL distributions are presented. Evaluation practice is also synthesized by covering discrimination metrics, censoring-aware RUL accuracy measures, and probabilistic assessment via proper scoring rules, including the time-dependent Brier score and Integrated Brier Score (IBS). The review provides researchers and practitioners with a practical guide to selecting, fitting, and evaluating survival models for risk-informed maintenance planning in smart energy networks.
Shadi et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: