The taxonomy of filamentous Bangiales was challenging due to its plastic and simple morphology. Molecular approaches play a significant role in revealing cryptic biodiversity and resolving phylogenetic relationships. Nonetheless, the biodiversity of filamentous Bangiales in many regions, including China, has not been thoroughly investigated yet using updated methods. In this study, we investigated the biodiversity of filamentous Bangiales in China, employing a more comprehensive and detailed sampling approach. The rbcL and 18S gene sequences (partial or complete) of 49 specimens collected from 37 sites were obtained. Phylogenetic analysis resolved these specimens into four clades, including Bangia, ‘Bangia’ 1, ‘Bangia’ 2, and Pseudoganglia. Seven putative species were delineated using empirical methods, including Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery (ABGD), General Mixed Yule Coalescent (GMYC), and Bayesian Poisson tree processes (bPTP), as well as genealogical analysis. Among them, four were species previously reported, two were cryptic species, and the other was a new record in China. The distribution of these molecularly delineated species was mapped along China’s coastline. Similar to the bladed Bangiales, antitropical, transoceanic, and thermal-gradient distribution patterns were also observed for filamentous Bangiales on a global scale. The ancestral region was retraced by incorporating species data from China into existing datasets using BioGeoBEARS with BAYAREALIKE + J as the best-supported model. Under this model, East Asia shows the highest marginal probability as the ancestral area for the crown clade, though uncertainty remains across alternative regions. A most parsimonious expansion scenario of Bangiales from east Gondwana to other regions of the world was proposed.
Wang et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: