Abstract This paper advances Thronaxis Cosmology as an alternative cosmological framework grounded in the empirically observable Polaris-Earth vertical fixity relationship. Through philological analysis of the Hebrew raqiya (firmament) and the tseva hashamayim (host of heaven), this study demonstrates that the biblical cosmological framework consistently points toward a throne-centered celestial architecture in which luminaries and angelic beings serve as purposefully created servants of the enthroned Creator. Genesis 2:1-3 establishes that 'all the host' of heaven were created for divine service, while Job 38:7 reveals the 'morning stars' singing alongside the 'sons of God'—indicating an intimate association between celestial bodies and angelic worship. The celestial revolutions of the raqiya—the observable nightly rotation of stars around the polar axis—represent not random mechanical motion but ordered liturgical procession, the host of heaven perpetually circling their enthroned King in perfect orbital worship. The research reframes the cosmological debate not as a conflict between science and religion, but as a contest between competing religious worldviews: the monotheistic throne-centered cosmology of Abrahamic traditions versus the neo-pagan, neo-classical religious cultus embedded within heliocentric astronomical theory. By extending the analysis to include Judaism, Islam, and other monotheistic traditions that affirm a transcendent God dwelling in the heavens above, this paper proposes Empirical Metadisciplinary Theology as a unifying framework that reconciles natural theology with revealed religion, offering common ground for all who acknowledge divine sovereignty above the raqiya. The paper argues that both geocentric and heliocentric models commit the same fundamental error of creature-veneration when they become objects of quasi-religious devotion, whereas Thronaxis Cosmology properly orients cosmological reflection toward the Creator's throne and recognizes celestial bodies as His servants executing their ordained circuits in covenantal faithfulness.
JPierre KIBIISYO MMASAI (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: