Background/Objectives: The purpose of this article (a comparative analysis of state laws) is to thoroughly examine enacted state-level healthy universal school meals bills to summarize bill content and determine current practices for program implementation and long-term viability, with special attention to the Community Eligibility Provision (CEP). Methods: Bills enacted at the state level, as of 31 December 2025, were located electronically on state legislature websites and subsequently reviewed with rules, regulations, and implementation guidelines. Content analyses were conducted to identify patterns, themes, and key concepts pertaining to healthy universal school meals laws and program implementation guidelines to inform comparison policy analyses. Results: Nine states (California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico, New York, and Vermont) have healthy universal school meals laws that include mandatory funding provisions for programming. Michigan is the only state that has a non-permanent law. Such laws eliminate requirements to certify individual students for free, reduced-price, or full-price meals based on their household income, and instead allow entire schools and/or school districts to offer all enrolled students no-cost meals. All states are funding healthy universal school meals programming by leveraging existing or new tax revenue to bridge the gap between the cost of school meals and federal meal reimbursements. Conclusions: State laws that leverage the Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) have become a key way to sustain universal school meal programs when federal funding falls short. States that direct resources to high-poverty schools, help districts determine the most accurate Identified Student Percentage, and reduce undercounting through strong direct-certification practices are better positioned to maintain universal meals over time. These strategies strengthen both child health and academic outcomes by ensuring stable access to no-cost, nutritious meals.
Thompson et al. (Sat,) studied this question.