PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 30, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The PDL–QCD Boundary: Structural Derivation of the Proton–Electron Mass Ratio Correction and a Parameter-Free Conjecture for Newton's Constant

View Full Paper
CLCédric Laubscher

Key Points

  • To derive the proton–electron mass ratio correction and conjecture about Newton's gravitational constant using the PDL framework.
  • Utilized the Projective Dynamic Logo (PDL) framework to derive mass ratios.
  • Identified factorisation at the PDL–QCD boundary for numerical analysis.
  • Proposed a parameter-free conjecture for Newton's gravitational constant based on derived values.
  • Proton–electron mass ratio correction δμ was found to factor as described.
  • Predicted value of (m_d − m_u) from PDL framework matched experimental data.
  • Newton's gravitational constant G conjectured accurately with a primary coherence leakage parameter.

Abstract

Within the Projective Dynamic Logo (PDL) framework, the bare proton-to-electron mass ratio is given by μPDL = Rₜot/Rₑ = 11017/6, which overshoots the experimental value μₑxp = 1836. 152673 by δμ = 0. 013993. This paper identifies the structure of this residual and proposes a factorisation at the PDL–QCD boundary. We show numerically that δμ factorises as δμ = (155/11017) · (1 − 2Δmᵢso/mₚ) + O (47 ppm), where 155/11017 is the leading-order valence engagement amplitude of the PDL proton and Δmᵢso = md − mᵤ is the QCD isospin mass difference. This factorisation yields the PDL prediction (md − mᵤ) PDL = 2. 532 MeV, at 0. 040σ of the PDG 2024 central value. From this factorisation, we derive a closed-form conjecture for the primary coherence leakage parameter εG ∈ ℚ (√5), accurate to 17 ppm against CODATA 2022, which — if proved as an exact identity — would make Newton's gravitational constant G a fully combinatorial prediction of the proton quintuplet (24, 28, 930, 10087, 11017) with Δmᵢso as the sole external input. The paper also predicts μ* = 1836. 152670, matching experiment to 0. 002 ppm, as a corollary of the conjecture. Steps (a) and (b) of the proof — establishing 155/11017 from PDL axioms and deriving the coefficient 2 structurally — are identified as open problems, resolved respectively in D29 and D30.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cédric Laubscher (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c9c553f8fdd13afe0bd3f7https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19282931
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper