PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 30, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Geometric Origin of the Top Quark Yukawa Coupling from M2-Brane Dynamics in M-Theory Compactification on G₂-Holonomy Manifolds

View Full Paper
MRMoustafa Amin Radwan

Key Points

  • This research aims to derive the top quark Yukawa coupling from M-theory compactification on G₂-holonomy manifolds.
  • First-principles derivation of the top quark Yukawa coupling.
  • Analysis of M-theory compactified on a G₂-holonomy manifold.
  • Utilization of Dirac-Born-Infeld action with quantised electromagnetic flux.
  • Predicted top quark mass aligns with experimental value at the 0.24σ level.
  • Derived charm quark mass with a precision of <0.1% error.
  • Established a Bayesian model comparison with a Bayes factor of 10⁸, indicating decisive support.

Abstract

A first-principles derivation of the top quark Yukawa coupling yₜ = 1 − αEM from M-theory compactified on a G₂-holonomy manifold (Joyce orbifold T⁷/ (Z₃ ⋉ I*), Betti numbers (b₂, b₃) = (27, 451) ). The top quark is identified with the M2-brane wrapping the minimal associative three-cycle with Euler characteristic χ = 1, yielding a bare Yukawa coupling of exactly unity. The Dirac-Born-Infeld action with Dirac-quantised electromagnetic flux introduces a self-energy correction reducing the effective tension. The worldvolume supersymmetry constraint on the superpotential, combined with canonical normalisation, yields yₜ = 1 − αEM + O (α²). The predicted top quark mass mₜ = (1 − αEM) × v/√2 = 172. 83 ± 0. 04 GeV agrees with the experimental value 172. 76 ± 0. 30 GeV at the 0. 24σ level, with theoretical uncertainty smaller than experimental precision by a factor of seven. The naive square-root scaling yₜ = √ (1 − αEM), predicting mₜ = 173. 47 GeV, is excluded at 2. 4σ, providing empirical discrimination between DBI expansion schemes. Three additional parameter-free predictions are derived from the same geometric hierarchy: the charm quark mass mc = αEM × v/√2 = 1. 270 GeV (<0. 1% error), the tau lepton mass m_τ = αEM × v = 1797 MeV (1. 1% error), and the Cabibbo mixing angle sin θc = (αEM/2√2) ^1/4 = 0. 2254 (0. 4% error). The last result constitutes an ab initio derivation of the Cabibbo angle from the fine-structure constant alone, without quark mass ratios or adjustable parameters. A Bayesian model comparison yields a Bayes factor of 10⁸ ("decisive" on the Jeffreys scale). All predictions employ the same three measured inputs (αEM, v, sin²θc) and the same G₂ geometry used in the companion Geometric Standard Model analysis of fifteen Standard Model observables (Zenodo DOI: 10. 5281/zenodo. 19256313) and in the resolution of the cosmological lithium problem (Zenodo DOI: 10. 5281/zenodo. 19266022). Paper: 9, 363 words, ~20 pages, 64 equations, 7 tables, 4 figures, 4 appendices, 161 references.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Moustafa Amin Radwan (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c9c553f8fdd13afe0bd46fhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19277767
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper