PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 30, 2026Discover Sustainability0 citationsOpen Access

The impacts of alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverage tax on different income groups in Vietnam

View Full Paper
LVLinh Hoang VuANAnh Ngoc NguyenTNT. Q. Nguyen

Key Points

  • Assess the effects of taxation on alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverage consumption across different income groups in Vietnam.
  • Utilized data from the 2018 Vietnam Household Living Standards Survey
  • Employed Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System for analysis
  • Estimated price and expenditure elasticities
  • Simulated impacts of various excise tax scenarios.
  • 20% tax on non-alcoholic beverages leads to 31% consumption reduction
  • 20% increase in alcohol tax reduces liquor consumption by 29.7% and beer by 26.6%
  • Effects are most pronounced in low-income households
  • Tax burden is modest relative to total household expenditure.

Abstract

Rapid growth in the consumption of alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages has become a major public health concern in Vietnam. This study assesses the potential impacts of excise taxation on the consumption and welfare distribution of alcoholic beverages (beer and liquor) and non-alcoholic beverages, using nationally representative data from the 2018 Vietnam Household Living Standards Survey (VHLSS) and a quality-adjusted Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System (QUAIDS). We estimate price and expenditure elasticities and simulate alternative excise tax scenarios. The results indicate that demand for beverages in Vietnam is price responsive. A simulated 20% excise tax on non-alcoholic beverages is associated with a reduction in consumption of approximately 31%, while a 20% increase in alcohol excise taxes is associated with reductions of about 29.7% for liquor and 26.6% for beer. These effects are strongest among low-income households, reflecting greater price sensitivity. The simulated tax burden remains modest—equivalent to around 0.46% of total household expenditure for non-alcoholic beverages and 3.9% for alcoholic beverages—while generating additional fiscal revenue. These findings suggest that excise taxation on beverages, particularly when designed to target harmful products such as sugar-sweetened beverages, can contribute to reduced discretionary beverage consumption and support fiscal sustainability. Integrating tax reforms with complementary measures, including nutrition education and non-communicable disease prevention, may further enhance equity and effectiveness.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69c9c5a4f8fdd13afe0bda23https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-03022-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper