What question did this study set out to answer?

To correct an error in the categorization of susceptibility for Candida glabrata in previous findings.

March 30, 2026Open Access

Corrigendum to “A five-year multicentre evaluation of candidaemia in UK adults: Epidemiology, risk factors and outcomes“ J Infect 92 (2026) 106692

Key Points

To correct an error in the categorization of susceptibility for Candida glabrata in previous findings.
Identification of an error in Figure 2 regarding Candida glabrata susceptibility categories.
Re-evaluation of the susceptibility definitions as resistant and susceptible-dose dependent/intermediate.
Presentation of an updated Figure 2 for clarity.
Clarified that Candida glabrata susceptibility should be described as resistant or susceptible-dose dependent/intermediate.

Abstract

The authors regret that there is an error in Fig. 2; for Candida glabrata, susceptibility should be categorised as "resistant" or "sus-ceptible-dose dependent (SDD)/intermediate (I)".We provide an updated Fig. 2 to clarify this.

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Logan et al. (Fri,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ca1280883daed6ee094fc2 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2026.106735

Bookmark

View Full Paper