PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026The Russian Review0 citationsOpen Access

Russia and the Birth of Right‐Wing Terrorism: Mass Politics, Antisemitism, and the Assassination of Mikhail Gertsenshtein

View Full Paper
MFMoritz Florin

Key Points

  • The study investigates the assassination of Mikhail Gertsenshtein as a critical moment in defining right-wing terrorism in the Russian Empire.
  • Analysis of court documents and police files
  • Review of censorship reports
  • Examination of public and political reactions
  • Contextual analysis of the political landscape
  • The assassination marked the emergence of 'right-wing terrorism' as a concept.
  • Far-right assassins distanced themselves from responsibility compared to revolutionary terrorists.
  • The event polarized political discussion, influencing definitions of terrorism.
  • A semantic shift occurred, framing all terrorism as an illegitimate political act.

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the assassination of Duma representative Mikhail Gertsenshtein in July 1906 as the pivotal moment for the emergence of the concept of “right‐wing terrorism” ( pravyi terrorizm ) in the Russian Empire. Drawing on court documents, police files, and censorship reports, this article argues that the significance of the Gertsenshtein murder lay less in the perpetrators’ intent, but more in its discursive and political impact. Unlike revolutionary terrorists who sought martyrdom and public justification, the far‐right assassins, linked to the Union of the Russian People ( Soiuz Russkogo Naroda ), denied responsibility and were motivated by a mercenary sense of state duty. At the same time, however, the assassination itself triggered a heated and emotional reaction among liberals and the revolutionary left, and it was within this context that a new label of “right‐wing terrorism” ( pravyi terrorizm ) first emerged. The ensuing public debate, amplified in the Duma and the press, polarized the political landscape and led to a semantic shift: terrorism, regardless of ideology, was increasingly defined as an illegitimate, corrosive political crime, setting a precedent for understanding and labeling right‐wing political violence in the twentieth century.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Moritz Florin (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5e745a333a821460ccb7https://doi.org/10.1111/russ.70149
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1“For Russia’s sake, everything is permitted.” The Russian radical right and legitimation of violence, 1900–19402025
  2. 2A change in religious consciousness as a factor influencing attitudes towards revolutionary terrorism in the early 20th century2025
  3. 3The Problem of Terrorism in the Security System of the Russian Empire at the turn of the XIX–XX centuries (on the example of the Yenisei Province)2024
  4. 4A generalizing work on the right-wing movements in Russia at the beginning of the 20th century2025
  5. 5A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEFT-WING AND RIGHT-WING TERRORISM IN GERMANY2025