Use vs. Prefer: Gaps in Sexual Health Sources for Hong Kong Adolescents

Although sexuality education is delivered in schools, Chinese adolescents’ preferred sources may still be inconsistent with where they currently receive sex education. Based on two theories (Objectivism and Sex-Positivity) that emphasize the use of information and rational choice in seeking information with a desire to learn more, this explanatory study analyses survey data on sexual health topics, the sources Chinese adolescents used and preferred, and the gender differences in how they seek information on sexual topics. From 17 secondary schools, Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong, aged 14–18 (n = 4869), took a 51-question survey on sexual risks and sex education sources conducted by a local agency. Using the secondary dataset, a discrepancy score was computed by matching 15 actually used and 15 preferred sources for getting sexual knowledge listed in the survey. The discrepancy scores were shifted along the X-axis to eliminate negative values and create the dependent variable, ‘Discrepancy-S’, which ranged from 1 to 11, where 1 = no discrepancy, and 11 = wide discrepancy (Cronbach Alpha = 0.750). The higher the score, the higher the discrepancy. Regression results indicated that the youth’s prior coitus and different information sources (except school) could explain the “use–prefer” discrepancy. Although these adolescents regarded parents as the primary sex educators, most did not consult with their families. They preferred electronic media and peers as their top “go-to” choices. Sex education should come from sources that teenagers rely on and choose to access. Personal responsibility must be explicitly discussed in various sexual health sources as teens prepare for transitions to adulthood.