The Location of Sense: A Vital Architecture with No Origin This paper proposes that all known communication theories share a single unexamined postulate: that sense has a direction — from an origin toward a destination. The directional bias is not a correctable error within existing models but a structural consequence of the vocabulary itself: every known linguistic family names communication from the act of emitting (lingua, sprache, parole, 言語). Attempts to invert the arrow (reception studies, reader-response theory), redistribute agency (semiotics, cultural studies), or dissolve the topology (enactivism, autopoiesis, deconstruction) have identified the problem but have not escaped it, because the operation remained unitary and therefore required something — difference, perturbation, trace, sign — occupying the structural position of the message. The paper introduces two irreducible operations — relatar and personar — that together constitute enactuation: the process by which every living organism defines its universe. Relatar is the organization of indicators into tramas (relational structures) that close in belief. Personar is the act of offering and making oneself available to the environment and to a network of relatadores. Neither operation requires, presupposes, or causes the other. Their independence dissolves the directional axis without inverting it: there is no arrow, no located sense, no carrier that transports meaning. Three solidary fetishes — of the arrow, of location, and of the carrier — collapse simultaneously. The model operates with three assumed conditions (will, belief, organization), introduces LAM (Licenses, Agreements, Mandates) as the rules that shape both operations, and extends across the vital system without restricting the architecture to organisms with nervous systems or language. Consequences are traced for epistemology, theoretical biology, content analysis, clinical practice, and education.
Guevara et al. (Thu,) studied this question.