PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 7, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Relative PSC and Recursive NEMS (Fractal Closure) Paper 16 (C2) of the NEMS Suite

View Full Paper
NSNova Spivack

Key Points

  • The research aims to establish principles of relative closure within the NEMS framework, focusing on subsystem semantics and emulation limits.
  • Define subsystems as autonomous frameworks with internal models.
  • Prove recursive principles related to internal semantics and records.
  • Formulate the No-Emulation theorem and its strengthened version.
  • Machine-check definitions and theorems in Lean 4.
  • Proved that complete internal semantics satisfies NEMS relative to its environment.
  • Established that rich subsystems can host undecidable internal adjudication.
  • Formalized a bridge between physical emulation and computational decidability.

Abstract

We introduce the concept of relative closure for subsystems within the No External Model Selection (NEMS) framework. By defining a subsystem as an autonomous framework FA with its own internal model, records, and truth relations, we prove a powerful recursion principle (Recursive NEMS): if a subsystem implements complete internal semantics (BICS) for its own records, it necessarily satisfies NEMS relative to its environment. Furthermore, we prove the heredity of the diagonal barrier: if a subsystem is rich enough to host Arithmetic Self-Reference (ASR), the undecidability of its internal record-truth applies directly to it, rendering its internal adjudication non-emulable by any total-effective algorithm. This establishes the "fractal" nature of semantic closure in NEMS. We also present a strengthened version of the No-Emulation theorem (deferred from Paper 15), explicitly formalizing the instance-level encoding that bridges physical emulation and computational decidability. All definitions and theorems are fully machine-checked in Lean 4. This overview presents the core NEMS theorem engine and selected applications; stronger domain-specific derivation and ontological synthesis claims belong to separate release surfaces with their own premise bundles and formal artifacts. Trust boundary. Recursive NEMS and stronger no-emulation use the subsystem formalism and instance encoding as defined in nems-lean ; "fractal closure" is shorthand for those proved heredity lemmas, not an additional metaphysical posit. See.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nova Spivack (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d49f8ab33cc4c35a227fc9https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19429746
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Necessary Adjudicators and Reflexive Self-Model Closure (RSMC) Paper 17 (C3) of the NEMS Suite2026
  2. 2From NEMS to MFRR: { A Machine-Checked Bridge Between Semantic Closure and Reflexive Reality}2026
  3. 3Determinacy Without Outsourcing Meta-Principles of Closure, Admissibility, and Internal Burden in the NEMS Program2026
  4. 4Overview of the NEMS Framework The No External Model Selection Suite: Structure, Progression, and Reader's Guide Paper 0 of the NEMS Suite2026
  5. 5The Theorem of Existential Rigidity (The Collapse of Contingency) Paper 21 (T4) of the NEMS Suite2026