PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 7, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Instability of Alignment in Human–AI Systems - Drift and Interaction Dynamics

View Full Paper
TBThomas A. Blüm

Key Points

  • The essay explores how alignment in human-AI systems fluctuates and proposes methods to improve stability in interactions.
  • Analyzed dynamics of human–AI interactions
  • Introduced concepts of local and global coherence
  • Recommended shift from output control to interaction stabilization
  • Identified drift as a significant challenge in maintaining alignment
  • Highlighted the need for methods to detect drift
  • Emphasized the importance of boundary maintenance for reliable collaboration

Abstract

This essay argues that alignment in human–AI interaction is not a stable property of models but a dynamically unstable process shaped by interaction. In extended interactions, systems tend to exhibit drift: gradual shifts in definitions, constraints, and conceptual boundaries that remain locally coherent while undermining global consistency. The essay introduces a distinction between local and global coherence and suggests that current alignment approaches primarily optimize for the former while neglecting long-term structural stability. It proposes a shift in perspective from controlling outputs to stabilizing interaction, emphasizing boundary maintenance, drift detection, and structural restoration as emerging requirements for reliable human–AI collaboration.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Thomas A. Blüm (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d49fc5b33cc4c35a228371https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19430584
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper