PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 21, 2010Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology872 citations

A Quantitative Systematic Review of Normal Values for Short-Term Heart Rate Variability in Healthy Adults

View Full Paper
DNDavid NunanUniversity of OxfordGSGavin SandercockPreventive CardiologyDBDavid A. BrodieBuckinghamshire New University

Structured PICO

What are the normal reference ranges for short-term heart rate variability in healthy adults?

P
Population
21,438 normally healthy adult participants from 44 studies published between January 1997 and September 2008.
I
Intervention
Short-term heart rate variability (HRV) measurement
O
Outcome
Normal values for short-term measures of HRVsurrogate

Short-term HRV values in healthy adults are lower than 1996 Task Force norms and exhibit massive interindividual variation, indicating a need for updated guidelines and standardized methodologies.

Limitations

  • Systematic failure to recognize the importance of RR data recognition/editing procedures
  • Failure to question disparate HRV values observed in normally healthy individuals

Abstract

Heart rate variability (HRV) is a known risk factor for mortality in both healthy and patient populations. There are currently no normative data for short-term measures of HRV. A thorough review of short-term HRV data published since 1996 was therefore performed. Data from studies published after the 1996 Task Force report (i.e., between January 1997 and September 2008) and reporting short-term measures of HRV obtained in normally healthy individuals were collated and factors underlying discrepant values were identified. Forty-four studies met the pre-set inclusion criteria involving 21,438 participants. Values for short-term HRV measures from the literature were lower than Task Force norms. A degree of homogeneity for common measures of HRV in healthy adults was shown across studies. A number of studies demonstrate large interindividual variations (up to 260,000%), particularly for spectral measures. A number of methodological discrepancies underlined disparate values. These include a systematic failure within the literature (a) to recognize the importance of RR data recognition/editing procedures and (b) to question disparate HRV values observed in normally healthy individuals. A need for large-scale population studies and a review of the Task Force recommendations for short-term HRV that covers the full-age spectrum were identified. Data presented should be used to quantify reference ranges for short-term measures of HRV in healthy adult populations but should be undertaken with reference to methodological factors underlying disparate values. Recommendations for the measurement of HRV require updating to include current technologies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nunan et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d5716c75589c71d767e1b0https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02841.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper