PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1994Psychological Bulletin1,152 citations

Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations.

View Full Paper
TWTimothy D. WilsonNBNancy Brekke

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We define mental contamination as the process whereby a person has an unwanted response because of mental processing that is unconscious or uncontrollable. This type of bias is distinguishable from the failure to know or apply normative rules of inference and can be further divided into the unwanted consequences of automatic processing and source confusion, which is the confusion of 2 or more causes of a response. Mental contamination is difficult to avoid because it results from both fundamental properties of human cognition (e.g., a lack of awareness of mental processes) and faulty lay beliefs about the mind (e.g., incorrect theories about mental biases). People's lay beliefs determine the steps they take (or fail to take) to correct their judgments and thus are an important but neglected source of biased responses. Strategies for avoiding contamination, such as controlling one's exposure to biasing information, are discussed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wilson et al. (1994) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d832c752654bb436d18602https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.117
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper