PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 15, 2017American Journal of Epidemiology294 citationsOpen Access

Separation in Logistic Regression: Causes, Consequences, and Control

View Full Paper
MMMohammad Alì MansourniaAGAngelika GeroldingerSGSander Greenland

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Separation is encountered in regression models with a discrete outcome (such as logistic regression) where the covariates perfectly predict the outcome. It is most frequent under the same conditions that lead to small-sample and sparse-data bias, such as presence of a rare outcome, rare exposures, highly correlated covariates, or covariates with strong effects. In theory, separation will produce infinite estimates for some coefficients. In practice, however, separation may be unnoticed or mishandled because of software limits in recognizing and handling the problem and in notifying the user. We discuss causes of separation in logistic regression and describe how common software packages deal with it. We then describe methods that remove separation, focusing on the same penalized-likelihood techniques used to address more general sparse-data problems. These methods improve accuracy, avoid software problems, and allow interpretation as Bayesian analyses with weakly informative priors. We discuss likelihood penalties, including some that can be implemented easily with any software package, and their relative advantages and disadvantages. We provide an illustration of ideas and methods using data from a case-control study of contraceptive practices and urinary tract infection.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mansournia et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8348e61e2ce1627d18ec3https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwx299
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper