PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 1986The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease3,819 citations

Development, Reliability, and Validity of a Dissociation Scale

View Full Paper
EBE. M. BernsteinYale UniversityFPFrank W. PutnamUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Key Points

  • To develop and validate the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES), a self-report questionnaire designed to reliably quantify dissociation in normal and clinical populations.
  • Constructed a 28-item self-report questionnaire using 100-mm visual analogue scales based on clinical data, interviews, memory loss scales, and expert consultations.
  • Administered the scale to 10 to 39 subjects across eight distinct populations: healthy adults, late adolescent college students, and patients with alcoholism, agoraphobia, phobic-anxious disorders, PTSD, schizophrenia, or multiple personality disorder.
  • Evaluation demonstrated high test-retest reliability and split-half reliability across test cohorts.
  • Statistically significant item-scale score correlations across all items confirmed strong internal consistency and construct validity.
  • Kruskal-Wallis testing and post hoc analyses showed significant differences between diagnostic groups, establishing criterion-referenced validity.

Abstract

Dissociation is a lack of the normal integration of thoughts, feelings, and experiences into the stream of consciousness and memory. Dissociation occurs to some degree in normal individuals and is thought to be more prevalent in persons with major mental illnesses. The Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES) has been developed to offer a means of reliably measuring dissociation in normal and clinical populations. Scale items were developed using clinical data and interviews, scales involving memory loss, and consultations with experts in dissociation. Pilot testing was performed to refine the wording and format of the scale. The scale is a 28-item self-report questionnaire. Subjects were asked to make slashes on 100-mm lines to indicate where they fall on a continuum for each question. In addition, demographic information (age, sex, occupation, and level of education) was collected so that the connection between these variables and scale scores could be examined. The mean of all item scores ranges from 0 to 100 and is called the DES score. The scale was administered to between 10 and 39 subjects in each of the following populations: normal adults, late adolescent college students, and persons suffering from alcoholism, agoraphobia, phobic-anxious disorders, posttraumatic stress disorder, schizophrenia, and multiple personality disorder. Reliability testing of the scale showed that the scale had good test-retest and good split-half reliability. Item-scale score correlations were all significant, indicating good internal consistency and construct validity. A Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc comparisons of the scores of the eight populations provided evidence of the scale's criterion-referenced validity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bernstein et al. (1986) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d901900e1b46d093ae2998https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-198612000-00004
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Dissociation in focus: replicating and extending network analytic insights based on the dissociative experiences scale2025
  2. 2The Dissociative Symptoms Scale: Psychometric properties of Scores on a German Version2025
  3. 3A Network Analytic Approach to Dissociation: New Insights from Clinical Data2024
  4. 4Development and validation of a short-form (6-item) version of the clinician-administered dissociative states scale (CADSS-SF)2026
  5. 5The severity of dissociation and dissociative phenomena in non-affective psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analyses2026