Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Copper-graphene nanocomposites have emerged as promising materials in tribology owing to their unique combination of high mechanical strength, excellent thermal conductivity (K), and self-lubricating behavior. Incorporation of graphene derivatives such as graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) has been shown to reduce the coefficient of friction (COF) by up to 60% and wear rates by 50–70%, primarily through the formation of stable graphene-based tribofilms. Advanced processing techniques, including spark plasma sintering (SPS), molecular-level mixing, and electrodeposition (ED), enable uniform graphene dispersion and strong interfacial bonding, yielding composites with 20–50% lower friction and 30–70% lower wear rates at reinforcement levels as low as 0.1–0.5 vol%. Furthermore, hybrid strategies, such as combining CNTs with silicon carbide, enhance wear resistance by up to 60% under high-load conditions. Mechanical enhancements have also been reported, with yield strength improvements exceeding 200% and hardness increases of 50–100% in optimized systems. However, excessive reinforcement (> 2.0 vol%) can lead to agglomeration, porosity, and performance degradation. This review critically analyzes the processing-structure-tribology relationships of Cu-Gr nanocomposites, emphasizing the balance between reinforcement level, dispersion quality, and interfacial engineering. The findings underscore their potential as next-generation self-lubricating materials for bearings, electrical contacts, and high-performance sliding systems.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
A. Fouda
Hossein Ahmadian
Waleed Nureldeen
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
King Abdulaziz University
Zagazig University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fouda et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d97a3ce6ab964fb0835dca — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-025-01415-2
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: