Forest fires pose a considerable threat to the security of ecosystems and human society, rendering accurate assessments of fire severity critical for ecological recovery and effective fire management. The differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR) has been employed to evaluate forest fire severity; however, it presents notable uncertainties owing to variations in data sources, temporal phases, and environmental factors. To address these challenges, this study analyzed 10 forest fires occurring between 2006 and 2023 in central Yunnan Province, China. First, a rapid sampling method utilizing very high-resolution imagery was developed to assess the performance of dNBR classification under varying conditions. Second, the study identified the optimal post-fire observation window and compared classification thresholds and accuracy between Landsat and Sentinel-2 imagery in assessing fire severity. Finally, the research explored the impacts of topographic correction and pre-fire vegetation differences on classification outcomes. The findings revealed the following: (1) Imagery captured in the spring of the fire year, characterized by minimal vegetation interference, demonstrated the highest classification stability and superior capability for identifying high-severity burns. (2) Landsat outperformed Sentinel-2 in regional accuracy (0.92 vs. 0.87), and direct threshold transfer between sensors resulted in a 39% underestimation of high-severity areas, underscoring the necessity for sensor-specific calibration. (3) Topographic correction provided limited practical benefits, merely yielding a marginal improvement in accuracy (+1.44%) with the SCS+C model in steep terrain, and was generally unnecessary. (4) The influence of pre-fire vegetation was discovered to be threshold-dependent: dNBR performed reliably in forests with pre-fire NDVI > 0.5, while adjusted approaches were solely recommended for sparse or heterogeneous vegetation. Overall, this study establishes a systematic framework for optimizing dNBR-based severity assessment, enhancing its accuracy and operational utility in forest fire management.
Han et al. (Thu,) studied this question.