Abstract Political and legal theorists have long been interested in how the principle of national self-determination emerged over the course of the twentieth century, particularly in relation to anti-colonial movements. In general, national self-determination has been associated with the anti-colonial turn to statehood, sovereignty, and representative government. This article recovers an anti-statist, anti-electoral theorization of self-determination from the work of Indian political thinker Radhakamal Mukerjee. I show how Mukerjee’s engagement with evolutionary theories of politics in the early twentieth century led him to depart from Indian nationalist appropriations of the discourse of self-determination in the aftermath of WWI. Mukerjee historicized state sovereignty, representative government, and individual rights as products of Western Europe’s trajectory of political development and constructed “Asia” as a region marked by anti-statist collectivism. The article thereby highlights the overlooked role of evolutionary arguments in forming a novel, anti-statist conceptualization of anti-colonial self-determination.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tejas Parasher
University of California, Los Angeles
The Review of Politics
University of California, Los Angeles
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tejas Parasher (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69db37964fe01fead37c596f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034670526100758
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: