PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 28, 2015American Journal of Hematology317 citationsOpen Access

Characteristics, clinical outcome, and prognostic significance of IDH mutations in AML

View Full Paper
CDCourtney D. DiNardoFRFarhad RavandiSASam Agresta

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The pathophysiology of IDH mutations in tumorigenesis is increasingly described, yet the prognostic significance of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in AML remains controversial. The primary objective of this study was to define the natural history and prognosis of patients with AML and IDH1 or IDH2 mutations and provide historical survival expectations. A total of 826 patients treated from 2010 to 2014 at a single institution were evaluated, including 167 patients (20%) with AML and IDH1 or IDH2 mutations. Median age was 62 years (range 18-92). There were 59 IDH1-R132, 83 IDH2-R140, and 23 IDH2-R172 mutations. Clinicopathologic characteristics associated with IDH-mutations included older age, less frequent therapy-related status, and increased incidence of intermediate-risk cytogenetics, FLT3-ITD mutations, and NPM1 mutations. Remission rates (CR/CRi) by AML treatment status were: induction, 68%; Salvage-1 (S1), 42%; and Salvage-2 and beyond (S2+), 27%. No difference in response was identified by IDH mutation status. Similarly, overall survival (OS) was not dependent on IDH status within any cohort. The median OS was 15.4 months in induction, 8.7 months in S1, and 4.8 months in S2+. This analysis defines the clinical outcome associated with IDH-mutations in both the front-line and salvage AML treatment settings, and confirms that response rate and OS for both IDH-mutated and IDH wild-type AML patients is comparable. This provides contemporary data to be used for comparison with results of novel investigational (e.g., selective IDH inhibitor) strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

DiNardo et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc570a5e1d727a1a27498dhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.24072
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The prognostic significance of IDH2 mutations in AML depends on the location of the mutation2011 · 269 citations
  2. 2Gene mutation patterns and their prognostic impact in a cohort of 1185 patients with acute myeloid leukemia2011 · 323 citations
  3. 3AG-221, an Oral, Selective, First-in-Class, Potent Inhibitor of the IDH2 Mutant Metabolic Enzyme, Induces Durable Remissions in a Phase I Study in Patients with IDH2 Mutation Positive Advanced Hematologic Malignancies2014 · 91 citations
  4. 4Recurring Mutations Found by Sequencing an Acute Myeloid Leukemia Genome2009 · 2,245 citations
  5. 5DNMT3A and IDH mutations in acute myeloid leukemia and other myeloid malignancies: associations with prognosis and potential treatment strategies2014 · 268 citations