PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 22, 2024Kidney360Open Access

CKD Management in the Age of Telenephrology

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Nephrology has seen an uptake in transition to remote care delivery, but the effect of telenephrology care on CKD progression is not well defined.

Does telenephrology care prevent eGFR decline in patients with CKD compared to standard in-person care?

Population

1098 patients seen across 4230 visits at a VA nephrology clinic

Comparison

Telenephrology (>50% virtual visits) vs in-person care (≤50% virtual visits)

Design

Observational cohort study

Follow-up

2-year period

Authors

ZSZachary A. ScherzerBABrad C. AstorDLDyan M. Lesnik

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Telenephrology was associated with similar eGFR trajectories versus in-person care; leaves open its scalability for CKD and requires randomized confirmation.

Structured PICO

Does telenephrology care prevent eGFR decline in patients with CKD compared to standard in-person care?

P
Population
1098 patients with CKD seen at a nephrology clinic within the Veterans Affairs (VA) health system
I
Intervention
Telenephrology care (>50% virtual visits)
C
Comparator
Standard in-person care (≤50% virtual visits)
O
Outcome
Slope of eGFR change over timesurrogate

Telenephrology in a hybrid system is associated with similar CKD progression outcomes as standard in-person care, suggesting it is a viable alternative for managing medically complex patients.

Limitations

  • Observational study design
  • Single VA health care system limiting generalizability

Cite This Study

Scherzer et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc881c25b1b6cb33359434https://doi.org/10.34067/kid.0000000641
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share