Abstract International student dropout presents a critical challenge for universities, with consequences for student well-being, institutional performance, and national economies. Despite their growing representation, limited research has investigated the psychological and institutional factors influencing dropout intention among international students. This study aimed to identify key psychological predictors of dropout intention and examine whether student appraisals of course content and institutional support moderate these relationships. To the authors’ knowledge, this is one of the first empirical investigations to explore these dynamics within an international student population in Australia. A total of 319 international students enrolled in Australian universities completed an online survey assessing mental health, resilience, mindfulness, filial piety, acculturation, financial stress, COVID-19 stress, sleep disturbance, and institutional perceptions. Hierarchical multiple regression and moderation analyses were conducted. Anxiety, COVID-19 stress, and poor sleep emerged as significant positive predictors of dropout intention, while resilience and reciprocal filial piety were significant negative predictors. Moderation analyses revealed that students’ appraisal of course content significantly strengthened the protective effects of both resilience and reciprocal filial piety. Appraisal of institutional support, however, did not moderate any of the identified relationships. These findings extend the dropout model by incorporating psychological health and cultural values into understanding persistence among international students. They highlight the importance of enhancing academic experiences and providing culturally sensitive mental health support. Institutions should consider integrating resilience-building and course quality initiatives to better support international student retention. Future research should adopt longitudinal approaches to examine how dropout intentions translate into actual behaviour over time.
Leow et al. (Wed,) studied this question.