PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 27, 2014American Economic Review379 citationsOpen Access

Household Bargaining and Excess Fertility: An Experimental Study in Zambia

View Full Paper
NANava AshrafEFErica FieldJLJean Lee

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We posit that household decision-making over fertility is characterized by moral hazard since most contraception can only be perfectly observed by the woman. Using an experiment in Zambia that varied whether women were given access to contraceptives alone or with their husbands, we find that women given access with their husbands were 19 percent less likely to seek family planning services, 25 percent less likely to use concealable contraception, and 27 percent more likely to give birth. However, women given access to contraception alone report a lower subjective well-being, suggesting a psychosocial cost of making contraceptives more concealable. (JEL C78, D12, D82, I31, J13, J16, O15)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ashraf et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69de99601d9bba5129b0c5e0https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.7.2210
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Desired Fertility and the Impact of Population Policies1994 · 674 citations
  2. 2Ostracism2006 · 1,816 citations
  3. 3Peru - Fertility responses to urban land titling programs : the roles of owndership security and the distribution of household assets2013 · 12 citations
  4. 4Modern contraception use in Ethiopia: does involving husbands make a difference?1993 · 173 citations
  5. 5Promoting and prioritizing reproductive health commodities: understanding the emergency contraception value chain in South Africa.2010 · 10 citations