In the version of this article initially published, an O 2 -TPD panel in Supplementary Fig. 32 was inadvertently mislabeled as CH 4 -TPD due to an error during figure preparation.This correction does not affect the article's conclusions regarding the catalyst's CH 4 adsorption behavior.Edits have been made to the corresponding description in "The origin of the catalytic performance" section of the main text where the current text "The contact angle measurements (CA, Fig. 5g) of CH 4 bubbles on water and O 2 temperature-programmed desorption (TPD, Supplementary Fig. S32) profiles were conducted.Compared with C 3 N 4 (CA = 105), Fe-DAC/g-C 3 N 4 exhibits a significantly reduced CH4 CA of 60" has replaced the original "The contact angle measurements (CA, Fig. 5g) of CH 4 bubbles on water and CH 4 /O 2 temperature-programmed desorption (TPD, Supplementary Fig. S32) profiles were conducted.Compared with C3N4 (CA = 105; T = 30.4C), Fe-DAC/g-C 3 N 4 exhibits a significantly reduced CH 4 CA of 60and a considerably higher CH 4 desorption temperature of 56.0 C."The changes have been made
Bu et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: