The taxation of software has long challenged tax systems, exacerbated by the rise of software-as-a-service (SaaS), cloud computing, automated digital services and the like. As software increasingly operates without transfer, download or ownership, traditional distinctions between goods, services and intangibles are becoming inadequate. This article explores why taxing software remains an exercise in “catching a shadow”, with particular focus on the Indian Supreme Court’s decision in Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT.The decision reaffirmed that payments for software constitute royalty only where there is a transfer of copyright, and not where users merely obtain restricted rights to use software under an end-user licence. The article analyses how this principle was applied to conventional software distribution models and then examines its limits when confronted with modern digital business models. While Engineering Analysis provides important guidance, the taxation of digital-economy software transactions remains unsettled and highly fact-dependent.
Saurav Bhattacharya (Wed,) studied this question.