PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy1 citations

Saccular Limited Dorsal Myeloschisis: A New Indication for Prenatal Surgery? Case Series and Scoping Review

View Full Paper
JMJosé Miguel MüllerECEdgardo Alejandro CorralMCMylene Cabrera-Morales

Key Points

  • To explore the implications of limited dorsal myeloschisis as a prenatal surgical indication and improve diagnostic accuracy.
  • Retrospective analysis of eight cases of limited dorsal myeloschisis diagnosed in 2024.
  • Collection of clinical, imaging, surgical, and histopathological data.
  • Comparison of misdiagnosed cases with accurately diagnosed and surgically treated cases.
  • Seven cases histologically confirmed as limited dorsal myeloschisis met the criteria by Pang.
  • Five patients exhibited Chiari II malformation, three had ventriculomegaly, and one required shunting.
  • Motor deficits observed in four cases ranged from L2 to L4.

Abstract

Introduction: Limited dorsal myeloschisis (LDM) is a rare type of closed spinal dysraphism characterized by a fibroneural stalk connecting a midline skin defect to the underlying spinal cord. When saccular, LDM can mimic open spina bifida (OSB) lesions such as myelomeningocele (MMC) in prenatal imaging, potentially leading to misdiagnosis and inappropriate management. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed eight cases of LDM diagnosed at the Dr. Franco Ravera Zunino Hospital in 2024. Clinical, imaging, surgical, and histopathological data were collected. Three cases were misdiagnosed prenatally as MMC and underwent fetal surgery; four were diagnosed and operated postnatally; one presented signs of sac rupture during gestation and was presumed LDM without histological confirmation. Results: All seven histologically confirmed LDM cases met the two classical criteria proposed by Pang: a cutaneous midline lesion and a fibroneural stalk confirmed with GFAP-immunopositive neuroglial tissue. Five of the cases exhibited Chiari II malformation (CMII), three had ventriculomegaly, and one required shunting. Motor deficits were observed in four patients, ranging from L2 to L4. Notably, one case initially excluded from fetal surgery due to unclear diagnosis later developed sac rupture and CMII progression. Conclusion: Our series highlights the need to include LDM in the differential diagnosis of OSB during prenatal evaluations. The differential diagnosis of LDM versus MMC remains a major prenatal challenge, particularly in the saccular form. Further studies are warranted to improve prenatal imaging and diagnostic accuracy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Müller et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e31f9e40886becb653edf1https://doi.org/10.1159/000551526
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Limited dorsal myeloschisis: a single-center retrospective study of a rare spinal dysraphism2026
  2. 2Co-existing limited dorsal myeloschisis, spinal dermal sinus tract, and dermoid cyst in a 3-month-old female infant: Illustrative case2026
  3. 3Spina Bifida Occulta, Syringomyelia, and Diastematomyelia in aToddler: A Two-Year Case Report2026
  4. 4Association of limited dorsal myeloschizis and corpus callosum lipoma: A case report and literature review2024 · 2 citations
  5. 5Prenatal Closure of Myeloschisis vs Myelomeningocele: Insights From the fMMC Consortium Registry2026