What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to synthesize evidence on outpatient and community-based care for malnourished infants under six months.

April 19, 2026

Outpatient and Community-based Management of Malnourished Infants aged under Six Months (infants u6m at risk of poor growth & development) : A Scoping Review

Key Points

The aim is to synthesize evidence on outpatient and community-based care for malnourished infants under six months.
Included studies published between 2007 and 2025 focusing on outpatient care for malnourished infants under six months.
Searched four databases and grey literature for relevant information and approaches.
Extracted data on interventions, outcomes, and barriers to effective care.
26 studies were included, with recovery rates for outpatient care reported between 65% and 91%.
Evidence was concentrated in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, showing outpatient care is feasible and acceptable.
Major barriers included shortages of trained staff and inconsistent care protocols.

Abstract

Malnourished infants u6m are a vulnerable but not enough-prioritized group, with low consolidated evidence to guide outpatient and community-based care. This study synthesized evidence on outpatient and community-based management of malnourished infants u6m, focusing on intervention strategies, outcomes, barriers, and policy implications. Following the JBI framework and PRISMA guidelines, this review included information about the outpatient or community-based management of malnourished infants u6m or mother-infant dyads, published in English between 2007 and 2025. Four databases and multiple institutional websites were searched, supplemented by grey literature. Data were extracted on various study features, interventions, and outcomes. Total 26 studies were included, only five published after the new 2023 WHO guideline. Evidence was concentrated in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Several included studies described outpatient care as feasible and acceptable in multiple contexts, with reported recovery rates ranging from 65% to 91%; however, methodological heterogeneity limits comparability across studies. Breastfeeding support, maternal health, and culturally adapted interventions were described as important indicators. Tools such as MAMI clinical care pathway, MUAC and the MAMI WAZ look-up chart were described as effective but require further validation and contextual testing. Major barriers mentioned shortages of trained staff, inconsistent protocols, and policy reluctance to scale outpatient models. Outpatient and community-based care for malnourished infants u6m aligns with recent WHO guidance on managing 'at-risk' infants. However, widespread adoption requires stronger evidence-based management or tools, integration into health systems, and national policies. Strengthening research and programmatic consensus will be essential to improve outcomes for this vulnerable population.

AI से पूछें

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Muktadir et al. (Fri,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e4741c010ef96374d8feb3 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954422426100419

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

AI से पूछें

Bookmark

View Full Paper