Coastal reclaimed areas are characterized by complex strata and high groundwater levels, and pile foundations in such areas often suffer from insufficient uplift resistance. Compared with conventional cast-in-place piles, squeezed branch piles exhibit superior uplift performance; however, studies on squeezed branch piles in reclaimed areas remain limited. To investigate the uplift bearing performance of squeezed branch piles in the complex strata of coastal reclaimed areas, in situ full-scale uplift tests were conducted in the Shenzhen Binhai Avenue (Headquarters Base Section) traffic reconstruction project. Based on the actual physical and mechanical properties of the soil strata, a three-dimensional numerical model was established and validated against the load–displacement curves obtained from the in situ full-scale uplift tests. On this basis, the uplift bearing performance of squeezed branch piles, the differences in uplift bearing performance between branch and plate structures, and their applicable strata were analyzed. The plate structure and different branch configurations of squeezed branch piles exhibit distinct symmetric configuration characteristics, and these configuration differences influence the overall uplift bearing performance. The results show that the load–displacement curves of the uplift piles are generally smooth, without obvious abrupt rises or drops, exhibiting a gradual variation pattern, and the maximum pile-head displacements are all less than 100 mm. The mobilization of the bearing capacity of the branch and plate structures exhibits a distinct temporal and sequential pattern, with the plate structures at shallower embedment depths mobilized earlier than those at greater depths. Compared with conventional cast-in-place pile foundations, the presence of branches and plates endows squeezed branch piles with better elastic mechanical behavior and higher rebound ratios during unloading. Under identical stratum and loading conditions, the uplift bearing performance of the plate is 133% higher than that of the six-radial-branch configuration, while that of the six-radial-branch configuration is 34% higher than that of the four-radial-branch configuration. It is recommended to adopt the six-radial-branch configuration in clayey sandy gravel strata and the plate configuration in gravelly clayey soil and completely weathered coarse-grained granite strata, whereas neither branches nor plates are recommended in soil-like strongly weathered coarse-grained granite strata.
Zeng et al. (Fri,) studied this question.