PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 20, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Structural Emergence of Intelligence (SEI) v2.4: From Structural Conditions to Empirical Decision Pathways

View Full Paper
KOKoji Okino

Key Points

  • The research aims to describe how intelligence emerges in both natural and artificial systems within a bounded structural regime.
  • Introduced an empirical decision framework for testing and falsification.
  • Formalized the effective ratio for estimating intelligence emergence.
  • Identified non-monotonic emergence regimes to explore cross-scale mapping.
  • Established a clear criterion for the falsifiability of the intelligence framework.
  • Found an explicit pathway from observation to theory testing for intelligence emergence.
  • Demonstrated that intelligence does not simply scale but emerges within a structural context.

Abstract

We present SEI v2. 4 (Structural Emergence of Intelligence), a minimal and falsifiable framework describing how intelligence emerges across natural and artificial systems. The central claim is that intelligence does not arise from scale alone, but emerges only within a bounded structural regime defined by: C⋅Γ⋅dSCdt>Θ (E, S, T) C dSCdt > (E, S, T) C⋅Γ⋅dtdSC>Θ (E, S, T) where: CCC: effective structural density ΓΓ: fixation / stabilization dSC/dtdSC/dtdSC/dt: persistence of structural organization Θ (E, S, T) (E, S, T) Θ (E, S, T): context-dependent emergence threshold Key Contributions in v2. 4 Introduction of an explicit empirical decision framework for validation or falsification Formalization of the effective ratio: R (E) =C⋅Γ⋅dSCdtΘ (E) R (E) = C dSC{dt} (E) R (E) =Θ (E) C⋅Γ⋅dtdSC Identification of a non-monotonic emergence regime (bounded optimum) Extension to time-evolving structural emergence windows R (E, T) R (E, T) R (E, T) Integration of cross-scale mapping across galactic, planetary, biological, neural, and AI systems Clear falsifiability criterion: if intelligence scales monotonically without a bounded optimum, the framework is weakened or falsified Empirical Interpretation SEI v2. 4 introduces a minimal pathway from observation to theory testing: Estimate R (E) R (E) R (E) from observed scaling data Detect presence or absence of a bounded peak regime Use this as a direct criterion for supporting or rejecting the framework Significance This work shifts intelligence from a scale-driven interpretation to a structurally constrained emergence phenomenon, providing: A unified structural language across domains A directly testable prediction framework A bridge between theoretical formulation and empirical validation All figures are fully reproducible using the provided Python scripts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Koji Okino (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e5c42603c2939914029ccdhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19642534
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper