Kolmogorov–Arnold Networks (KANs) have recently gained increasing attention as an alternative to conventional neural architectures, mainly because they replace fixed activation functions with learnable univariate mappings defined along network edges. This design not only increases modeling flexibility but also makes it easier to interpret how inputs are transformed within the network while maintaining parameter efficiency. KANs are particularly well suited for sensor-driven systems where transparency, robustness, and computational constraints are critical. This study provides a survey of KAN-based approaches for processing sensor data. A literature review conducted from 2024 to 2026 examined the deployment of KAN models in industrial and mechanical sensing, medical and biomedical sensing, and remote sensing and environmental monitoring, utilizing a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-based methodology. We first revisit the theoretical foundations of KANs and their main architectural variants, including spline-based, polynomial-based, monotonic, and hybrid formulations, to structure the discussion. From a practical standpoint, we then examine how KAN modules are integrated into modern deep learning pipelines, such as convolutional, recurrent, transformer-based, graph-based, and physics-informed architectures. KAN-based models demonstrate comparable predictive performance as conventional machine learning models, while having fewer parameters and more interpretable representations. Several limitations persist, including computational overhead, sensitivity to noisy signals, and resource-constrained device deployment challenges. Real-world sensor systems encounter significant challenges in adopting KAN-based models, including scalability in large-scale sensor networks, integration with hardware architectures, automated model development, resilience to out-of-distribution conditions, and the need for standardized evaluation metrics. Collectively, these observations provide a clearer understanding of the current and potential limitations of KAN-based models, offering practical guidance on the development of interpretable and efficient learning systems for future sensor equipment applications.
Martínez‐Heredia et al. (Sun,) studied this question.