PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026Water Policy0 citationsOpen Access

Local water governance in times of scarcity: lessons from the San Rafael Canal Users Association, Chile

View Full Paper
AAAna Caroline AvancoMCMayarí CastilloRPRodrigo Pérez-Silva

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore how local water organizations in Chile manage water scarcity and the influence of power dynamics on access.
  • Qualitative study involving interviews, participant observation, and document analysis
  • Focus on the San Rafael Canal Users Association in the Maule Region
  • Analysis of power relations and social inequalities in water access
  • Formal rules favor large landowners, creating unequal access to water
  • Social relations and gender norms affect participation in decision-making
  • Collective management practices reflect and reinforce existing social inequalities

Abstract

ABSTRACT Map of the Río Claro watershed, Chile, alongside four boxes summarising the study context, methodology, local organisation, and findings on water governance under scarcity. In the context of the climate crisis, water scarcity has become an increasingly critical challenge, particularly in rural territories affected by long-term reductions in rainfall. While much research has focused on the role of the state and public policies, less attention has been paid to how local water organizations respond to this crisis in practice, especially in Latin America. This article focuses on Chile's Maule Region, examining the case of the San Rafael Canal Users Association. Drawing on a qualitative approach that combines interviews, participant observation, and document analysis (2023–2024), the study explores how power relations within the organization shape unequal access to water and influence collective responses to scarcity. The findings reveal that formal rules reproduce hierarchies that privilege large landowners, while social relations and gender norms determine who participates and who is excluded. Material resources and institutional position further mediate the capacity to adapt and influence decisions, showing how collective management, both reflects and reinforces broader social inequalities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Avanco et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9b9a285696592c86ec445https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2026.193
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper