PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 29, 2026Sri Ramachandra Journal of Health Sciences0 citations

Seronegative antiphospholipid syndrome: Diagnostic challenges, novel biomarkers, therapeutic ambiguities, and future perspectives

NRNimay RastogiSRShreya Rastogi

Key Points

  • This review aims to explore the diagnostic challenges and novel biomarkers in seronegative antiphospholipid syndrome (SN-APS).
  • Synthesized recent advancements in SN-APS diagnosis and treatment.
  • Examined non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies and their clinical utility.
  • Discussed the role of omics technologies and immunophenotyping in understanding SN-APS.
  • Identified significant diagnostic overlap with other autoimmune diseases causing ambiguity.
  • Emphasized the need for advanced diagnostic frameworks beyond classic antiphospholipid antibody testing.
  • Highlighted the 2023 classification criteria's limitations in addressing seronegative patients.

Abstract

This review synthesizes recent advancements in understanding seronegative antiphospholipid syndrome (SN-APS), a condition characterized by clinical manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) despite persistently negative conventional antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) tests. The absence of these traditional markers necessitates a deeper exploration into novel biomarkers and advanced diagnostic methodologies to bridge the existing serological gap. This includes scrutinizing “non-criteria” antiphospholipid antibodies and exploring their clinical utility in improving diagnostic precision for patients with high clinical suspicion yet negative conventional markers. The review also addresses the significant diagnostic overlap with other systemic autoimmune diseases, complicating accurate diagnosis and often leading to therapeutic ambiguities. Furthermore, an emphasis is placed on emerging omics technologies and immunophenotyping as promising avenues for unraveling the intricate pathological mechanisms underlying SN-APS, thereby potentially identifying novel diagnostic targets and therapeutic strategies. Such advancements are crucial given that SN-APS patients, despite fulfilling clinical criteria, often remain undiagnosed and untreated until severe clinical events occur, necessitating improved diagnostic frameworks beyond the 2006 Sydney classification criteria. The advent of the 2023 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology classification criteria for APS, while incorporating additive weight for clinical and laboratory domains, still necessitates at least one positive conventional aPL, thereby leaving a subset of patients with clinical signs but negative criteria aPL in a diagnostic void.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rastogi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f1a033edf4b46824806d1bhttps://doi.org/10.25259/srjhs_27_2025
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper