PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 30, 2026Lara D. Veeken0 citations

P110 Non-melanoma skin cancer risk with Janus kinase inhibitors compared to interleukin-6 inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: results from a national cohort study

View Full Paper
ZTZixing TianLKLianne Kearsley-FleetSZSizhen Steven Zhao

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to evaluate the risk of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) associated with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) compared to interleukin-6 receptor inhibitors (IL-6Ri) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
  • Data analyzed from the BSRBR-RA cohort linked to NCRAS.
  • Cohorts included patients initiating first JAKi or IL-6Ri without previous skin cancer.
  • Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios, controlling for confounding using propensity score weighting.
  • In the primary analysis of 4,248 patients, 91 NMSC events occurred in the IL-6Ri cohort, and 27 in the JAKi cohort, with a HR of 1.52 (95% CI: 0.82-2.85).
  • In the secondary analysis, NMSC events were 32 for IL-6Ri and 19 for JAKi, with a crude HR of 1.91 (95% CI, 1.06-3.43).
  • After propensity score weighting, the HR for JAKi vs IL-6Ri was 1.69 (95% CI 0.78-3.65), not statistically significant.

Abstract

Abstract Background/Aims Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is the most common malignancy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Tofacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi), has been associated with higher NMSC risk than tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in people with RA and cardiovascular risk in the ORAL Surveillance trial. It is uncertain whether that extends to other JAKi or the broader RA population, or if tofacitinib increased the risk or simply is less protective than TNFi. This analysis aims to assess NMSC risk with JAKi compared to interleukin-6 receptor inhibitors (IL-6Ri) in RA. Methods This study used data from the British Society for Rheumatology Rheumatoid Arthritis Register (BSRBR-RA), a national prospective RA cohort, linked to the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS). People with RA initiating their first JAKi (tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib) or first IL-6Ri (tocilizumab originator, tocilizumab biosimilar, or sarilumab) without prior exposure to the comparator class and history of skin cancer were included. The outcome, the first-ever NMSC, was identified from NCRAS. The primary analysis was an ever-exposed model and the secondary analysis was an on-treatment model (exposure time definitions in the Table). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs), using propensity score weighting to control for confounding. Missing data were addressed using multiple imputation. Results A total of 4,248 patients were included in the primary ever-exposed analysis. The IL-6Ri cohort (n = 2,945) had 91 NMSC events, and the JAKi cohort (n = 1,303) had 27 events. The propensity score weighted HR for JAKi vs IL-6Ri was 1.52 (95% CI: 0.82-2.85). In the secondary on-treatment analysis, 32 and 19 NMSC events occurred in IL-6Ri and JAKi cohorts. The crude HR was 1.91 (95% CI, 1.06-3.43). After propensity score weighting, the difference between JAKi and IL-6Ri was not statistically significant (HR, 1.69, 95% CI 0.78-3.65). Conclusion This cohort analysis did not identify a statistically significant difference in the risk of NMSC between JAKi and IL-6Ri, with a median follow-up of 3.3 years in the JAKi cohort in the primary analysis. Disclosure Z. Tian: None. L. Kearsley-Fleet: None. S. Zhao: Consultancies; Novartis, UCB, AlfaSigma, AbbVie, Jassen. Other; support for conference attendance from Novartis, UCB, AlfaSigma, Eli Lilly. J. Galloway: Honoraria; Abbvie, Alfasigma, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. Grants/research support; Abbvie, GSK, Janssen and Pfizer. M. Lunt: None. K. Watson: None. N. Azadbakht: None. K. Hyrich: Honoraria; Abbvie. Grants/research support; Pfizer and BMS. Other; NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203308).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tian et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f2f2221e5f7920c6387993https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keag121.144
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Risk With JAK Inhibitors Compared to Interleukin‐6 Receptor Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results From a National Cohort Study2026
  2. 2POS0231 COMPARATIVE SAFETY OF JAK INHIBITORS VERSUS TNF OR IL-17 INHIBITORS FOR CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE, VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM AND CANCER IN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS AND AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3OA05 Potential impact of European Medicines Agency measures to minimise risk of serious side effects on those using JAK inhibitors in the UK2024
  4. 4Safety of Janus kinase inhibitors compared to biologic therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease2026
  5. 5OA39 The influence of safety warnings on the prescribing of JAK inhibitors in England: an interrupted time-series analysis2024 · 1 citations