PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A Study of Environmental Law for Its Better Implementation and Improvement

View Full Paper
AHAditi Apoorva Vivek Hembrom

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the implementation challenges of environmental law in India and suggest improvements.
  • Analysis of historical laws and judicial precedents
  • Examination of institutional frameworks and their impacts
  • Case studies on pollution and community involvement
  • Identified key failures in implementation: under-funding, regulatory overlap, and political interference.
  • Highlighted successful judicial interventions supporting the right to a clean environment.
  • Proposed solutions include technology integration, enhanced transparency, and community participation to improve enforcement.

Abstract

Abstract The Indian environmental law is considered to be one of the most progressive and extensive legal regulations of developing countries, but its implementation of the statute books into the practical protection is painfully poor. This paper discusses the constitutional foundation, historic laws, institutional framework, and judicial precedents that collectively constitute environmental jurisprudence in India. It follows the process of the post-Stockholm period, through the revolutionary 42nd Constitutional Amendment to the creation of the National Green Tribunal, noting how courts have continued to give life to Article 21 by accepting the right to clean environment as a part of the right to life. In spite of these successes, the paper openly explores long-standing implementation failures: endemic under-funding of pollution control boards, overlapping regulatory jurisdiction, political interference, poor post-clearance monitoring, and lack of community involvement in the decision-making processes. By examining some of the most notable judicial decisions, including the principle of absolute liability, the doctrine of polluter-pay and recent decisions in climate matters, the paper will identify the advantages and disadvantages of judicial activism. It also questions real world examples such as the long-term air pollution crisis in Delhi to the current problems of Ganga rejuvenation and forest diversion scandals. Finally, this study contends that India lacks shortage of laws but a drastic lack of enforcement systems, accountability in institutions and political will. It provides practical, concrete solutions, such as integration of technology, capacity building, increased transparency and greater citizen involvement to curb the growing divide between law and the environment. The paper concludes that sustainable development can only be achieved when enforcement is as strong as the law itself so that future generations can enjoy the benefits of sustainable development.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aditi Apoorva Vivek Hembrom (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f44464967e944ac556757ehttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19896377
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper