PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Power of Corporate Governance and the Stock Market Volatility of Listed Firms in Nigeria

View Full Paper
OYOnipe Yahaya

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore how various corporate governance mechanisms influence stock market volatility in listed firms in Nigeria.
  • Analyzed data from 148 firms listed on the Nigerian Exchange Group from 2011 to 2025, resulting in 2,072 firm-year observations.
  • Employed two-step system Generalised Method of Moments (GMM) to control for endogeneity and other statistical issues.
  • Examined governance factors such as board independence, CEO duality, and audit committee independence in relation to stock return volatility.
  • Board independence, gender diversity, and audit committee independence negatively affect stock return volatility (p<0.05).
  • CEO duality, leverage, and political connection significantly increase volatility (p<0.05).
  • Higher audit quality, via Big-4 auditor engagement, correlates with lower volatility, as does growth in the macroeconomic environment.

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of corporate governance mechanisms on stock market volatility among 148 firms listed on the Nigerian Exchange Group (NGX) over the period 2011 to 2025, yielding an unbalanced panel dataset of 2,072 firm-year observations. Drawing on agency theory, signalling theory, and resource dependence theory, this study examines the roles of board independence, CEO duality, board gender diversity, and audit committee independence as primary governance predictors, while controlling for firm size, leverage, liquidity, profitability, asset tangibility, firm age, sales growth, asset turnover, board size, audit quality, ownership concentration, industry classification, GDP growth rate, political connection, and foreign exchange exposure. Employing a two-step system Generalised Method of Moments (GMM) estimator to address endogeneity, heteroskedasticity, and serial correlation, the findings reveal that board independence, gender diversity, and audit committee independence each exert statistically significant negative effects on stock return volatility, while CEO duality, leverage, ownership concentration, political connection, and foreign exchange exposure amplify volatility. Notably, audit quality — proxied by Big-4 auditor engagement — and macroeconomic growth are negatively associated with volatility. The study contributes novel empirical evidence from an emerging African market context, offering important insights for regulators, institutional investors, corporate boards, and policymakers committed to deepening capital market stability in Nigeria and analogous frontier markets.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Onipe Yahaya (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f44464967e944ac556767chttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19879667
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper