PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 5, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Presence without Possession: Perceptual Misalignment and the Field of Access in Archaic Greek Poetics

View Full Paper
SVSandra Voss

Key Points

  • This work develops a theory of perceptual misalignment in archaic Greek poetics, emphasizing mediated fields of access.
  • Analyzed archaic Greek texts including works by Homer, Sappho, and Pindar.
  • Explored concepts of presence and absence through various forms of indices like voices and objects.
  • Revised earlier comparative frameworks focused on modernist narrative and archaic Greek poetics.
  • Proposed a concept of presence that is accessible without possession or full coincidence with indices.
  • Demonstrated that bodies and voices cannot be fully controlled by their subjects.
  • Reorganized arguments around mediated presence and perceptual misalignment in Greek poetics.

Abstract

This work develops a theory of perceptual misalignment and the field of access in archaic Greek poetics. Its central claim is that presence is not simply possessed by a subject, source, body, object, place, or occasion, but becomes accessible through mediated fields of voice, gesture, body, performance, inscription, memory, and reception. The work argues that archaic Greek poetics should not be understood through a simple opposition between presence and absence, or between exteriority and interiority. Instead, it proposes the concept of presence without possession: a mode of mediated presence in which an index makes something present without fully coinciding with what appears to guarantee it. Through readings of Homeric epic, Sappho 31, Alcaeus, Pindaric praise, Nestor’s Cup, the Midas epigram, Phrasikleia, and other inscriptional and epigrammatic forms, the essay shows how archaic Greek texts organize presence through non-coincident indices: bodies that register what the subject cannot master, voices that exceed speakers, objects that speak, places that are displaced, and monuments that make memory durable. The work substantially revises and expands earlier stages of the author’s field-of-access project. It does not replace the earlier comparative essay on modernist narrative and archaic Greek poetics, but reorganizes the argument around a Greek-focused account of mediated presence, perceptual misalignment, and pre-subjective poetics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sandra Voss (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f9892215588823dae1803fhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20002623
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper