PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 6, 2026AIAA Journal0 citations

Response of a Transitioning Hypersonic Boundary Layer to Repetitive Laser–Surface Interactions

View Full Paper
SLShelby LedbetterNWNicholas WebberMGMark Gragston

Key Points

  • This research examines how repetitive laser–surface interactions affect the transitioning hypersonic boundary layer.
  • Conducted experiments in Mach 7 Ludwieg tube at University of Tennessee Space Institute.
  • Used a pulse burst laser system with various repetition rates for laser–surface interactions.
  • Visualized flowfield effects through high-speed schlieren imaging; monitored boundary-layer changes with pressure sensors.
  • Significant reduction in boundary-layer fluctuations at higher frequencies observed.
  • Transition resulted in larger turbulent structures and thickening of the boundary layer.
  • Strong interactions caused significant separation and transition impacts on nonincident side of the model.

Abstract

Experiments were conducted in the University of Tennessee Space Institute’s Mach 7 Ludwieg tube, examining the impact of laser–surface interactions on the transitioning boundary layer on a 91-6 flared cone with Formula: see text million per meter. Laser–surface interactions were created using a pulse burst laser system operating with a 1064 nm output at repetition rates of 50, 100, 200, and 400 kHz. Global flowfield effects were visualized using high-speed schlieren imaging, and high-response surface pressure sensors were used to monitor changes in boundary-layer spectral content. Results show that for both weak and strong laser–surface interactions (as defined in this work), a significant reduction in boundary-layer fluctuations at higher frequencies occurs, which is also accompanied by a shift to larger turbulent structures and a thickening of the boundary layer. In strong interactions, it is also shown that significant separation can occur and that wraparound effects can even cause boundary-layer thickening and transition impacts on the nonincident side of the model.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ledbetter et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fa8e0b04f884e66b530608https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j066559
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Experimental Investigation of Hypervelocity Shock Wave–Boundary-Layer Interactions on a Deflected Control Surface2026
  2. 2Delay of Boundary-Layer Transition over a Slender Cone in Supersonic Particle-Laden Flow2026
  3. 3Experimental Investigation of Highly Separated Transitional Shockwave Boundary Layer Interactions2025
  4. 4Hypersonic Transitional Boundary Layer Profile Measurements with Molecular Tagging Velocimetry2025
  5. 5Displacement of hypersonic boundary layer instability and turbulence through transpiration cooling2024 · 7 citations