Truth commissions have become central mechanisms of transitional justice in the aftermath of mass violence and systemic human rights abuses, charged with documenting violations, enabling redress, and fostering national reconciliation. This article examines how truth commissions shape official historical narratives, focusing on the interaction between empirical truth-seeking, collective memory, and the political imperatives of social healing. Drawing on qualitative analysis of commissions across four continents, including curated archival records and interviews, the study shows that although history is widely invoked, commissions vary significantly in their methodological approaches and historical outputs. We argue that the consensus histories produced by truth commissions, while constrained by institutional mandates and political contexts, play an important role in addressing epistemic injustice by incorporating perspectives that have long been excluded from dominant narratives. At the same time, we call for greater engagement by historians with these histories and epistemic transitional justice, and alignment amongst commissions with the standards of professional historiography. Conceptualized as hybrid institutions of justice, memory, and historiography, truth commissions generate layered and contested historical accounts that resist simple dismissal. Even when instrumental and politically shaped, these histories can contribute meaningfully to epistemic transitional justice and more inclusive national understandings of the past.
Ibhawoh et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: