Introduction: Frailty is highly prevalent and prognostically significant among older adults with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Studies have shown that women are more likely to be frail compared with men; however, sex differences in frailty phenotypes remain underexplored in CVD. Purpose: We quantified sex differences in frailty phenotypes among community-dwelling older adults with CVD. Methods: We used data from participants in Round 12 of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) with a reported history of CVD (history of heart disease and myocardial infarction). The Frailty Phenotype Criteria were used to assess frailty: unintentional weight loss, weakness, slowness, physical exhaustion, and low physical activity. To determine if participants met these criteria, we 1) applied original operationalized definitions for NHATS data (Original NHATS), and 2) replaced the weakness (based on 5-repeat chair stands, not grip strength) and slowness criteria with measures from the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Weighted descriptive and comparative statistics were used to compare frailty phenotypes between women and men. Results: Of the 1477 community-dwelling older adults in Round 12 with a reported history of CVD, the average age (±standard error) was 76.4±0.2 years, 45.3% were female, and 81.3% were non-Hispanic White (Table 1). Using the original NHATS criteria measures (N=1080), 15.6% were frail, but there was no significant sex difference (p = 0.064). Replacing weakness and slowness criteria with the SPPB measures (N=1289), 46.8% were frail, and women were significantly more likely to be frail compared with men (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The prevalence of frailty among older adults with CVD varies depending on the criteria for weakness and slowness; however, using the SPPB measures augmented our sample size. Moreover, observed sex differences in frailty may depend on the criteria used.
Hiatt et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: