PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 7, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Resolving the Black Hole Information Paradox: Sequestration, Not Destruction

View Full Paper
WZWang ZijunXFXu Fengkai

Key Points

  • This research aims to address the black hole information paradox by clarifying the concept of information sequestration.
  • Theoretical analysis of black hole formation and evaporation processes.
  • Examination of the implications of Bekenstein-Hawking entropy.
  • Review of Hawking radiation mechanisms and conceptual frameworks.
  • Sequestration of information behind the event horizon is not equivalent to its destruction.
  • Black holes retain information as part of their macroscopic characteristics like mass and charge.
  • Concludes that the information paradox stems from a conceptual misidentification rather than a physical inconsistency.

Abstract

Abstract The black hole information paradox—the apparent loss of unitarity during formation and evaporation of a black hole—is shown to arise from a category mistake. Sequestration of matter behind an event horizon is not equivalent to destruction of information. A black hole's existence, characterized by its externally observable mass , angular momentum, and charge, already constitutes the complete macroscopic record of the infallen matter. The Bekenstein-Hawking entropy is precisely the statistical measure of this sequestration; the generalized second law holds automatically without access to the interior. We further clarify that the standard heuristic of Hawking radiation—virtual pairs with negative energy falling in and positive energy escaping—unnecessarily conflicts with the one-way nature of the horizon. A black hole can possess a temperature and radiate without forcing information to return through the horizon. The ultimate fate of sequestered information, should the black hole evaporate, is naturally accounted for by transfer into a new, causally independent universe created at the former singularity. The paradox, therefore, is not a physical inconsistency but a conceptual misidentification. A black hole, simply by existing in the parent universe, is its own record.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zijun et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbefd5164b5133a91a3e3ahttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20033514
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper