PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026BMC Urology1 citationsOpen Access

The effect of tranexamic acid in perioperative bleeding transfusion in radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PMPedro Faria MakabeLCLuís Fernando Ferreira CavalcanteBYBruno Yuamoto

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to evaluate the effect of tranexamic acid on perioperative bleeding and safety in radical cystectomy.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024628394).
  • Included randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing TXA versus no TXA.
  • Used random-effects models with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman (HKSJ) adjustment to calculate pooled risk ratios.
  • Pooled analysis showed a non-significant reduction in perioperative blood transfusion risk (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.25–1.86; p = 0.25).
  • Risk of venous thromboembolism was not significantly different (RR 1.60; 95% CI 0.80–3.17; p = 0.10).
  • Current evidence is underpowered to confirm the efficacy or safety of TXA, necessitating further large-scale randomized trials.

Abstract

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic agent with demonstrated benefits in various surgical procedures, including urological surgeries. However, its effect on radical cystectomy (RC) remains uncertain, largely due to limited data from an earlier meta-analysis that combined RC with substantially different urological procedures, as well as conflicting results from two recently published meta-analyses specifically evaluating the impact of TXA on RC. This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024628394) and conducted following PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing TXA versus no TXA in patients undergoing RC. Primary endpoints included perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Random-effects models with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman (HKSJ) adjustment were used to calculate pooled risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Three studies (one RCT and two propensity-score matched observational studies) involving 1,344 patients (673 TXA; 671 control) were included. The pooled analysis for PBT showed a non-significant reduction in risk (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.25–1.86; p = 0.25; I2 = 81%). Similarly, the risk of VTE was not significantly different between groups, although a potential trend toward increased risk was noted (RR 1.60; 95% CI 0.80–3.17; p = 0.10; I2 = 0%). Current evidence is underpowered to confirm the efficacy or safety of TXA during radical cystectomy. While no significant benefit or harm was identified, the wide confidence intervals necessitate further large-scale randomized trials to provide definitive clinical guidance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Makabe et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed123b9154b0b828786c0https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-026-02162-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper