PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 2026Cureus0 citationsOpen Access

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Major Depressive Disorder: Clinical Evidence, Neurobiological Mechanisms, and Treatment Perspectives

DRDiego A Angulo RodríguezMEMaria F Gonzalez EspinosaGMGerson Olivera Morales

Key Points

  • This review aims to summarize the effectiveness of rTMS in major depressive disorder, particularly for patients who do not respond to standard treatments.
  • Conducted a narrative review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses published from 2006 to 2025.
  • Prioritized sham-controlled and multisite study designs.
  • Included 31 articles focusing on rTMS and major depressive disorder.
  • Approximately 29% response rate for high-frequency rTMS protocols in controlled trials.
  • Theta burst stimulation demonstrated comparable efficacy to conventional protocols with reduced session duration.
  • Neuroimaging biomarkers indicate potential predictive value but are not yet routinely used in clinical settings.

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) remains one of the leading causes of disability worldwide, and a substantial proportion of patients do not achieve remission with standard pharmacological treatments. In this context, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has gained increasing clinical recognition as a non-invasive alternative with a growing evidence base. We conducted a narrative review through a structured PubMed search combining the terms "major depressive disorder," "repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation," "rTMS," "theta burst stimulation," and "treatment-resistant depression." We prioritized randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and international clinical guidelines published between 2006 and 2025, favoring sham-controlled and multisite designs. A total of 31 articles were included. The available evidence supports the use of rTMS in patients with MDD who have not responded adequately to antidepressant therapy, though response rates remain modest--approximately 29% for high-frequency protocols in controlled trials. No reliable method currently exists for predicting which patients will benefit before treatment begins. Theta burst stimulation has shown comparable efficacy to conventional protocols in shorter sessions, and accelerated paradigms, such as Stanford Neuromodulation Therapy, have yielded striking preliminary results, though replication in larger and more representative samples is still needed. Neuroimaging biomarkers, particularly resting-state connectivity measures, show promise but remain outside routine clinical reach. How to sustain response after an acute course--and for whom--remains an open and underexplored question. rTMS has earned its place in the treatment of MDD. What the field still needs to answer is who benefits most, when to introduce it, and how to keep patients well over time.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rodríguez et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed16ab9154b0b82878c1chttps://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.108454
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper