Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: Evidence for the superiority of surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of Rockwood type 3 acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation is still lacking. Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that surgical treatment will outperform nonsurgical treatment. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A prospective randomized trial involving 4 study centers was performed from January 1, 2011, to March 31, 2016. A total of 85 patients with acute Rockwood type 3 ACJ dislocations were allocated randomly to receive either nonsurgical or surgical treatment. A total of 70 patients were treated as allocated, and 8 patients made an early crossover from nonsurgical to surgical treatment, leaving 47 patients treated surgically and 31 patients nonsurgically. All patients were followed up longitudinally, including clinical evaluation using the Constant score and standardized radiographic evaluation, with final follow-up after 2 years. Results: < .001). Neither primary horizontal instability nor younger age were associated with inferior clinical outcomes after nonsurgical treatment. Conclusion: Surgical treatment of ACJ Rockwood type 3 injuries did not lead to superior functional outcomes. Neither younger age nor horizontal instability were associated with inferior outcomes after nonsurgical treatment. Surgical treatment led to a slower recovery and to higher complication and revision rates. Registration: ISRCTN registry (study ID: ISRCTN92265154).
Tauber et al. (Tue,) studied this question.