PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 1974Circulation503 citationsOpen Access

Hemodynamic Predictors of Myocardial Oxygen Consumption During Static and Dynamic Exercise

View Full Paper
RNRichard R. NelsonFGFredarick L. GobelCJCharles R. Jorgensen

Structured PICO

What are the best hemodynamic predictors of myocardial oxygen consumption during static and dynamic exercise in normal subjects?

P
Population
10 normal subjects (combined with previous data for a total of 29 normal young men)
I
Intervention
Static exercise (17% maximal voluntary contraction), dynamic exercise (upright bicycle), and combined static and dynamic exercise
C
Comparator
Different exercise modalities compared to each other
O
Outcome
Myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2) and its correlation with hemodynamic predictorssurrogate

The product of heart rate and blood pressure is a strong, readily measured predictor of myocardial oxygen consumption during various forms of exercise in normal subjects.

Abstract

Hemodynamic predictors of myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO 2 ) during static and dynamic exercise were examined in ten normal subjects. Studies were done under the following circumstances: 1) during upright bicycle exercise at an average heart rate of 147 beats/min, 2) during static exercise with an isometric load in the left hand equal to 17% of the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), and 3) during combined dynamic exercise (average heart rate 147 beats/min) and static exercise using 17% MVC of the left hand. Mean myocardial blood flow (MBF) was 181 ml/100 gm LV/min during dynamic exercise, 98 ml/100 gm LV/min during static exercise, and 201 ml/100 gm LV/min during combined static and dynamic exercise. Addition of a static load to the dynamic load resulted in a higher blood pressure (average 12 mm Hg), MVO 2 and MBF than during dynamic exercise alone. MVO 2 correlated best with products of heart rate and blood pressure regardless of whether the blood pressure was obtained by a central aortic catheter ( r = 0.88) or by a blood pressure cuff ( r = 0.85). When the current data were combined with previous data, 82 determinations of MVO 2 and MBF in 29 normal subjects during several levels of upright exercise were available for analysis. Forty-four determinations were done during dynamic upright exercise, 18 during exercise after propranolol, ten during combined static and dynamic work, and ten during static work alone. MVO 2 correlated best with the product of heart rate and blood pressure ( r = 0.86). Heart rate alone correlated better with MVO 2 ( r = 0.82) than did the tension time index ( r = 0.65) or the product of systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and ejection time ( r = 0.68). The readily measured variables of heart rate and of heart rate x blood pressure correlated well with MVO 2 in normal young men during exercise under a wide variety of circumstances.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nelson et al. (1974) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a011dbf36f190e958b4f072https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.50.6.1179
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper