PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 11, 20260 citationsOpen Access

AABA Task Force on the Ethical Study of Human Remains Recommendations: Proposal for the Management and Oversight of Community Partnership and Ethical Stewardship of Human Remains

View Full Paper
BABenjamin M. AuerbachFJFatimah JacksonSBShamsi Daneshvari Berry

Key Points

  • This research aims to establish ethical guidelines for the management of human remains in scientific institutions, focusing on community involvement.
  • Surveys and discussions were conducted with biological anthropologists and a national cross-section of African Americans to gather perspectives.
  • Recommendations were drafted based on convergent analysis of established priorities for ethical engagement.
  • Institutions are advised to inventory legacy collections and identify descendant communities for collaboration.
  • All surveyed groups expressed a strong desire for partnerships in decision-making regarding legacy collections.
  • Recommendations include obtaining explicit consent from descendant communities before conducting research on human remains.
  • Examples of successful community partnerships in managing human remains are presented to support ethical practices.

Abstract

Ethically responsible and culturally acceptable management, study, and stewardship of legacy skeletal and other human remains currently held and managed in scientific institutions is a longstanding concern that, over the length of these collections' existence, has been exiguously addressed. Most recently, the ethical treatment of legacy collections of individuals from the African American community in the United States has been especially highlighted. The American Association of Biological Anthropologists (AABA) created a Presidential Task Force to address these concerns about legacy collections in 2022 by drafting practices and recommendations for policies to be adopted by the AABA and sibling organizations. We report on the first ever convergent analysis of research priorities and perspectives on these topics from the communities of biological anthropologists and a national cross-section of African Americans. Based on the surveys and discussions with these communities, all groups expressed a desire to enter a mutual, formal partnership where descendant communities are empowered to make decisions about the study and disposition of legacy collections. Our recommendations focus on promoting dialogue between parties involved through partnerships where desired. To make this possible, institutions should inventory and determine provenance of remains in legacy collections, ascertain the identity of descendant communities, and contact those communities using guidelines we provide. We argue that a default position taken by researchers is that no research need occur without the explicit consent of relevant descendant communities or communities of care. Examples of successful community partnerships are provided, along with new practices in ethical engagement with descendant communities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Auerbach et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a01723a3a9f334c282725c9https://doi.org/10.21220/280
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper