PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2021Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery10 citations

Can Deep Brain Stimulation Withdrawal Syndromes Be Avoided by Removing Infected Implanted Pulse Generator and Cables with Contralateral Replacement in the Same Session?

View Full Paper
AHAnn‐Kristin HelmersCKCarolin KubeltSPSteffen Paschen

Key Result

One-session removal of an infected implanted pulse generator with contralateral replacement resulted in 0 invasive infections and uninterrupted stimulation therapy in 6 high-risk patients.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=6)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does one-session removal of an infected IPG and cables with contralateral replacement prevent withdrawal syndromes and invasive infections in patients at high risk?

P
Population
6 patients with a high risk of withdrawal syndrome (e.g., Parkinson's disease) with an infected implanted pulse generator (IPG) and cables
I
Intervention
One-session removal of infected IPG and cables with contralateral replacement
O
Outcome
Postoperative complications, invasive infection, and interruption of stimulation therapysafety

One-session removal of an infected IPG and cables with contralateral replacement appears to be an effective strategy to avoid withdrawal syndromes without causing invasive infections.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Infections are feared complications following deep brain stimulation in 1.9 to 17.6% of cases. These infections can necessitate the removal of implants, which carries the risk of life-threatening withdrawal syndromes, especially in patients suffering from Parkinson's disease. In this report, we describe our procedure of removing an infected implanted pulse generator (IPG) and cables with contralateral replacement in the same session. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed all patients with transpositions of an IPG and cables between 2017 and 2020 in a single-centre, university hospital setting. Medical records of all patients undergoing this particular surgical procedure were systematically reviewed. The shortest follow-up time was 12 months. RESULTS: Between 2017 and 2020, we had 6 patients with a high risk of withdrawal syndrome in whom an infected IPG with cables was removed and replaced on the opposite side in the same session. There were postoperative complications in 2 patients: in one, the generator had to be re-affixed, and in the second, a skin transplant was required over one electrode because of skin necrosis. No case of invasive infection was seen, and the stimulation therapy was not interrupted. CONCLUSION: One-session removal of an IPG and cables with contralateral replacement seems to be an effective therapy for patients at high risk of withdrawal syndrome.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Helmers et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Infected deep brain stimulation implants at high risk of withdrawal syndrome (n=6). One-session removal of infected implanted pulse generator and cables with contralateral replacement was evaluated on Invasive infection. One-session removal of an infected implanted pulse generator with contralateral replacement resulted in 0 invasive infections and uninterrupted stimulation therapy in 6 high-risk patients.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a04fec97d96552991e45d55https://doi.org/10.1159/000513808
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper