PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 15, 2005Circulation151 citations

Resting Myocardial Blood Flow Is Impaired in Hibernating Myocardium

View Full Paper
JSJoseph B. SelvanayagamMJMichael Jerosch‐HeroldIPItalo Porto

Key Result

Quantitative CMR perfusion imaging detected significantly reduced resting myocardial blood flow in hibernating myocardium compared to nondiseased segments (0.7 vs 1.2 units; P<0.001).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=27)

Structured PICO

Does quantitative CMR perfusion imaging detect impaired resting myocardial blood flow in hibernating myocardium before and after PCI in patients with coronary disease?

P
Population
27 patients with 1 or 2-vessel coronary disease (80% to 95% stenosis) and at least 1 dysfunctional myocardial segment undergoing PCI
I
Intervention
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with preprocedure, early (24 hours), and late (9 months) postprocedure CMR imaging
C
Comparator
Myocardial segments without significant coronary stenosis (internal control)
O
Outcome
Resting myocardial blood flow (MBF) assessed by quantitative CMR perfusion imagingsurrogate

Quantitative CMR perfusion imaging demonstrates that resting myocardial blood flow is significantly impaired in hibernating myocardium and normalizes following revascularization.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 0.7% vs 1.2%

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although impairment in perfusion reserve is well recognized in hibernating myocardium, there is substantial controversy as to whether resting myocardial blood flow (MBF) is reduced in such circumstances. Quantitative first-pass cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) perfusion imaging allows absolute quantification of MBF. We hypothesized that MBF assessed at rest by quantitative CMR perfusion imaging is reduced in hibernating myocardium. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with 1 or 2-vessel coronary disease and at least 1 dysfunctional myocardial segment undergoing PCI were studied with preprocedure, early (24 hours), and late (9 months) postprocedure CMR imaging. First-pass perfusion images at rest were acquired in 3 short-axis planes by use of a T1-weighted turboFLASH sequence. In each slice, MBF was determined for 8 myocardial segments in mL . min(-1) . g(-1) by deconvolution of signal intensity curves with an arterial input function measured in the left ventricular blood pool. Cine MRI for assessment of global and segmental function and delayed enhancement MRI for detection of viability were also obtained. All coronary lesions were 80% to 95% stenosis in severity. Over all segments, mean MBF normalized by rate-pressure product ("corrected MBF") was 1.2+/-0.3 mL . min(-1) . g(-1) . (mm Hg . bpm/10(4))(-1) in segments without significant coronary stenosis and 0.7+/-0.2 mL . min(-1) . g(-1) . (mm Hg . bpm/10(4))(-1) in segments with coronary stenosis before PCI (mixed model controlling for slice and segment z=-23.9, P<0.001). Early after the procedure, the MBF was 1.2+/-0.2 mL . min(-1) . g(-1) . (mm Hg . bpm/10(4))(-1) in revascularized segments and 1.3+/-0.2 mL . min(-1) . g(-1) . (mm Hg . bpm/10(4))(-1) in nondiseased segments (z=-6.1, P<0.001). Late after PCI, the systolic wall thickening and end-diastolic wall thickness both increased significantly more (both P<0.001) in the myocardial segments subtended by severe coronary stenosis (8+/-17% to 40+/-19% and 6.5+/-1.1 to 9.3+/-2 mm, respectively) than in the myocardial segments supplied by nondiseased vessels. Mean MBF in dysfunctional segments with significantly improved contraction after revascularization was 0.8+/-0.2 mL . min(-1) . g(-1) . (mm Hg . bpm/10(4))(-1) before PCI and 1.2+/-0.2 mL . min(-1) . g(-1) . (mm Hg . bpm/10(4))(-1) after PCI (z=2.0, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: CMR perfusion imaging detects impaired resting MBF in hibernating myocardial segments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Selvanayagam et al. (2005) conducted an observational in 1 or 2-vessel coronary disease with hibernating myocardium (n=27). Quantitative CMR perfusion imaging vs. Nondiseased myocardial segments was evaluated on Resting myocardial blood flow (MBF) normalized by rate-pressure product (p=<0.001). Quantitative CMR perfusion imaging detected significantly reduced resting myocardial blood flow in hibernating myocardium compared to nondiseased segments (0.7 vs 1.2 units; P<0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0513d66c3d07813971bc7bhttps://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.549170
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper