PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 2026The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America0 citations

The relationship between personal attenuation rating and the risk of significant threshold shifts in military personnel

View Full Paper
DKDevon KulinskiBSBenjamin S. SheffieldDBDouglas Brungart

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore the connection between personal attenuation ratings (PAR) and the incidence of significant threshold shifts (STS) in military personnel.
  • Examined audiometric data from 1829 military personnel during annual hearing conservation appointments.
  • Compared personal attenuation ratings to STS rates over a 12-month period.
  • Conducted hearing protector fit testing without immediate training to determine baseline fitting proficiency.
  • Individuals with the lowest PAR (0 dBA) showed significantly higher STS rates compared to the rest of the sample.
  • Individuals with the highest PAR (>35 dBA) exhibited markedly lower STS rates.
  • Results advocate for effective HPFT implementation to prevent hearing loss.

Abstract

Hearing protector fit testing (HPFT) ensures individuals achieve adequate Personal Attenuation Ratings (PAR) from hearing protection in noisy environments. However, the relationship between the measured PAR and the risk of future hearing loss remains poorly understood. This study examined PAR and audiometric data from 1829 military personnel during required annual hearing conservation appointments. PAR was compared to significant threshold shift (STS) rates experienced in the 12-month period prior to the hearing test. HPFT was performed without immediate training to assess baseline fitting proficiency at the time of the scheduled appointment. The results indicate that individuals with the lowest PAR (0 dBA) had significantly higher STS rates than the remaining sample, and that individuals with the highest PAR (35 dBA) demonstrated markedly lower STS rates. This evidence supports efficient and effective HPFT implementation in hearing conservation clinics by linking protection ability directly to hearing loss prevention outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kulinski et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a056668a550a87e60a1e7b6https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0040751
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Personal attenuation rating as an indicator of audiometric threshold shifts2026
  2. 2Fit test data: Attenuation of uniform-fit high-fidelity hearing protection devices2025
  3. 3Electroacoustic validation of a neck-based field attenuation estimation system2026
  4. 4Comparing long-term effects of different earplug fit-training methods on U.S. Marine Corps training recruits2025 · 1 citations
  5. 5Insertion loss, head related transfer function distortion, and test-specific band importance functions improve Speech Intelligibility Index predictions of Speech in Noise performance during hearing protector use2025